지산열린학원지산고2 · 25년 10월 · 32번지식이 너무 방대하고 세분화되어 오늘날 누구도 어떤 것의 전체를 다루는 전문가가 되기 어렵다.
Knowledge has become so vast and divided that today nobody can be an expert in the whole of anything.
도입: 와인 전문가가 화학을 알면 얻는 것이 많듯, 신체에 대한 각 관점은 서로를 향상시킬 수 있다. (S1) / 전개: 그러나 도구·신체 영역마다 깊은 전문성 요구 → 인체를 분리(silo)해서 연구, 공동체마다 전문 용어로 단절 — 도구 하나·세포 하나에 전념, 세포 간 소통도 별도 주제. (S2~S4) / 결론: 단순한 생명체도 전체로 연구하는 일이 드묾, 1890년에 이미 지식이 너무 방대 → 오늘날 누구도 어떤 것의 전체에 대한 전문가가 아니다. (S5~S7)
☠ 수남의 하수인: 칸막이 탑의 문지기




| 단어 | 뜻 | 동의어 / 반의어 |
|---|---|---|
| expert | 전문가 | = specialist ↔ amateur |
| chemistry | 화학 | — |
| underlie | ~의 기초가 되다 | = form the basis of |
| perspective | 관점 | = viewpoint |
| potentially | 잠재적으로 | = possibly |
| enhance | 향상시키다 | = improve ↔ weaken |




Just as an expert in the taste and colour of wine will gain much by being aware of the chemistry that underlies those qualities, so each perspective on the body can potentially enhance the others. And yet every scientific tool, from microscopes to mathematics, and every aspect of the body, from the brain to the microorganism, requires such depth of expertise that this tends not to happen: we tend to study the human body in silos, each community sectioned from the others by its own specialised vocabulary. Research communities may be dedicated to one type of scientific tool or a specific component of the body, such as one type of cell. How different types of cell communicate with one another becomes its own specialist topic. Even simple forms of life on Earth are now rarely studied as a whole, and the human body is evidently much more complex. As long ago as 1890, The Times newspaper commented that knowledge ‘had already become too vast to be manageable’. Today, nobody is an expert in the whole of anything.
Because each field needs deep expertise, we study the body in silos, and no one is an expert in the whole of anything.
분야마다 깊은 전문성이 필요해서 인체를 칸칸이 나눠 연구하며, 오늘날 누구도 어떤 것 전체의 전문가가 아니다.
32. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은? [3점]
원래 시험 정답: ② nobody is an expert in the whole of anything
다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은? [3점]
Just as an expert in the taste and colour of wine will gain much by being aware of the chemistry that underlies those qualities, so each perspective on the body can potentially enhance the others. And yet every scientific tool, from microscopes to mathematics, and every aspect of the body, from the brain to the microorganism, requires such depth of expertise that this tends not to happen: we tend to study the human body in silos, each community sectioned from the others by its own specialised vocabulary. Research communities may be dedicated to one type of scientific tool or a specific component of the body, such as one type of cell. How different types of cell communicate with one another becomes its own specialist topic. Even simple forms of life on Earth are now rarely studied as a whole, and the human body is evidently much more complex. As long ago as 1890, The Times newspaper commented that knowledge ‘had already become too vast to be manageable’. Today, .
정답 ② nobody is an expert in the whole of anything — 원래 시험 32번 정답 ② nobody is an expert in the whole of anything! 근거는 S2~S6 — 칸막이 연구, 도구·세포 하나에 전념, 전체로는 거의 연구 안 함, 지식이 너무 방대. 그러니 오늘날 누구도 전체의 전문가가 아니에요.
⚔️ 강신용의 함정: Different perspectives on the body can never help each other… 그럴까? can never help가 함정이다. can potentially enhance the others. (S1)
"Different perspectives on the body can never help each other." → 'can never help each other'는 틀림 → 'can potentially enhance the others' (S1)