지산열린학원25년 10월 · 34번역량 접근법은 동물을 인간과의 유사성으로 서열화하지 않고, 각 동물이 고유한 삶의 형태 속에서 번성할 기회를 가져야 한다고 본다.
The Capabilities Approach rejects ranking animals by likeness to humans; each creature should flourish in its own form of life.
흐름: ~이 아니다 → 진짜 기준은?
☠ 수남의 하수인: 서열 저울 기사




| 단어 | 뜻 | 동의어 / 반의어 |
|---|---|---|
| rank | 순위를 매기다 | = grade, classify |
| likeness | 유사성 | = resemblance ↔ difference |
| privilege | 특권 | = advantage |
| irrelevant | 무관한 | ↔ relevant |
| sentient | 지각이 있는 | = conscious |
| flourish | 번성하다 | = thrive ↔ decline |




What is the Capabilities Approach (CA), and why would lawyers passionate about animal justice care about it? It is easy to say what it is not. The CA does not rank animals by likeness to humans or seek special privileges for those considered most “like us,” as do some other popular theoretical approaches. The CA has concern for the finch and the pig as much as the whale and the elephant. And it argues that the human form of life is simply irrelevant when we think about what each type of animal needs and deserves. What is relevant is their own forms of life. Just as humans seek to be able to enjoy the characteristic goods of a human life, so a finch seeks a finch’s life and the whale a whale’s life. We should extend ourselves and learn, not lazily picture animals as lesser humans, seeking a life sort of like our own. According to the CA, each sentient creature should have the opportunity to flourish in the form of life characteristic for that creature.
The CA argues each animal should thrive according to its own form of life, not human likeness.
역량 접근법은 각 동물이 인간과의 유사성이 아닌 자신의 삶의 형태에 따라 번성해야 한다고 주장한다.
원래 시험 정답: ⑤ in the form of life characteristic for that creature
빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?
It argues that the human form of life is simply irrelevant… What is relevant is ________.
정답 ④ — so a finch seeks a finch’s life and the whale a whale’s life.
⚔️ 강신용의 함정: ① — 바로 앞에서 부정한 ‘인간과의 유사성’.