지산열린학원23년 11월 · 29번📌 제시의 요지
장기 기증자의 뇌사 판정 기준을 더 엄격하게 하면 대중의 의심을 줄이기보다 오히려 키울 수 있으므로, 기준은 모든 사망자에게 동일해야 한다.
Tougher brain-death rules for organ donors may raise rather than ease public suspicion, so criteria should be the same for everyone.
🌊 정미의 문단 흐름
흐름: 엄격한 규정 → 의도 → But 역효과!
☠ 수남의 하수인: 불신의 까마귀
🧚 산이의 어휘
| 단어 | 뜻 | 동의어 / 반의어 |
|---|---|---|
| transplantation | 이식 | = transfer |
| diagnosis | 진단 | = identification |
| premature | 시기상조의 | = early ↔ timely |
| suspicion | 의심 | = distrust ↔ trust |
| criteria | 기준(복수) | = standards |
| cremation | 화장 | ↔ burial(매장) |
📖 본문 보기
Some countries have proposed tougher guidelines for determining brain death when transplantation — transferring organs to others — is under consideration. In several European countries, there are legal requirements which specify that a whole team of doctors must agree over the diagnosis of death in the case of a potential donor. The reason for these strict regulations for diagnosing brain death in potential organ donors is, no doubt, to ease public fears of a premature diagnosis of brain death for the purpose of obtaining organs. But it is questionable whether these requirements reduce public suspicions as much as they create them. They certainly maintain mistaken beliefs that diagnosing brain death is an unreliable process lacking precision. As a matter of consistency, at least, criteria for diagnosing the deaths of organ donors should be exactly the same as for those for whom immediate burial or cremation is intended.
🏹 시은의 질문 · “한 문장으로 줄이면?”
Stricter brain-death rules for donors may actually increase public distrust, so the same criteria should apply to all.
기증자에 대한 더 엄격한 뇌사 규정은 오히려 대중의 불신을 키울 수 있으므로 모두에게 같은 기준을 적용해야 한다.
🎯 원래 시험 정답
원래 시험 정답: ④ lack → lacking
📝 수지의 문제 풀이 (어법)
다음 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?
Some countries have proposed tougher guidelines for determining brain death when transplantation — transferring organs to others — is under consideration. In several European countries, there are legal requirements which specify ①that a whole team of doctors must agree over the diagnosis of death in the case of a potential donor. The reason for these strict regulations for diagnosing brain death in potential organ donors ②is, no doubt, to ease public fears of a premature diagnosis of brain death for the purpose of obtaining organs. But it is questionable whether these requirements reduce public suspicions as much as they create ③them. They certainly maintain mistaken beliefs that diagnosing brain death is an unreliable process ④lack precision. As a matter of consistency, at least, criteria for diagnosing the deaths of organ donors should be exactly the same as for those for ⑤whom immediate burial or cremation is intended.
- that
- is
- them
- lack
- whom
🗡️ 흑검 ET의 정답 보기
정답 ④ — 문장의 동사는 이미 is가 있으므로 lack은 동사가 될 수 없다. 명사 process를 뒤에서 꾸미는 현재분사 lacking(정밀성이 부족한 과정)이 되어야 한다.
⚔️ 강신용의 함정: ② is — 주어가 길지만 핵심 주어는 단수 The reason이라 is가 맞음. ⑤ whom — 전치사 for의 목적어이므로 목적격 whom이 맞음.